Sometimes the healthiest and only way to deal in a relationship is through a triangle. Now I know you’re thinking, ‘the whole problem is I can’t speak to this woman, that’s why I’m even reading your blog post’. But also recognize it’s a reality that there are three of you guys in this dynamic.Ī healthy relationship is you speaking directly to that person. So we want to reduce that as much as possible. When we have baby mama drama going on there’s a lot of ‘tell her…’ ‘she should know…’ that kind of stuff.
It means you are not communicating directly with a person. So when there’s a lot of ‘make sure you tell her…’ and ‘you need to let her know this’ we’re talking about a triangle. Ultimately your job is to get yourself out of the triangle.īut first what is a triangle? Triangling behavior is when you have three people who are communicating between each other. Your job is to make this triangle the healthiest triangle as possible. Many issues we have in life are that we don’t want to accept what is. What you have to recognize is that you’re dealing with an already dysfunctional relationship. I don’t necessarily think that every single triangle is unhealthy, but most are. But there’s nothing you can do about it in this scenario. Psychologically, triangles are not healthy in relationships. So the first thing you need to remember is that you are in the middle of a relationship triangle when you have a husband and a baby mama in your life. You’re becoming obnoxious, and then everybody loses. If you’re caught up in ‘she has to respect me’, then you’re losing point of the big picture. Remember the whole point of dealing with baby mama drama is to have peace and health. As a wife you should be a permanent fixture, so you deserve the respect of that position.īut, don’t let that idea of respect get to your head, okay? There’s a lot of other facets going on that you’re goin to have to deal with as a wife of a man who has a child with another woman or women. Show lessīeckett's Endgame has been criticised for being both excessively abstract and exaggeratedly emotional – an ambivalence reflected in Beckett’s own words on the play, which range from the purely musical to “groans and howls”.Dealing with baby mama drama as a wife is very different from dealing with baby mama drama as a girlfriend. Given this background, even the suspicion that Hamm is not only blind but also “hard of hearing” only bolsters the case for music’s relevance to Endgame. Indeed, from Pythagoras to Beethoven, hammers may be seen as not external to music, but integral to it. Furthermore, by deriving “Clov” not from clavus (“nail”) but from clavis (“key”), one arrives at a more complex image for the relationship between Hamm and Clov: “Hammerklavier”. As well as blunt, heavy implements, “hammers” invoke thoughts of tuning-forks, ears, and pianos. The established interpretation of “Hamm” as “hammer” is also capable of far greater subtlety, particularly if one attends to the German context of this clue. Using Michel Serres’s idea of “dur” (“hard” sensory data) and “doux” (“soft” intelligible information), this paper considers how three sounds in Endgame (the sea, the alarm, and the “headheart”) undermine traditional distinctions between music, sound, and noise.
Hence, while Endgame has understandably figured little in discussions of Beckett and music, the very severity of music’s excision from Endgame suggests that it might be a key to the play. Beckett's Endgame has been criticised for being both excessively abstract and exaggeratedly emotional – an ambivalence reflected in Beckett’s own words on the play, which range from the purely musical to “groans and howls”.
0 kommentar(er)
